Do I think Trump should modulate his future speech? Yes, that would be good
I swear: if Trump stopped tweeting today, his approval rating would go up 10 points.
when any mass shooting happens is it the president’s fault?
i’m talking over the last few decades..
Do I think Trump should modulate his future speech? Yes, that would be good
I swear: if Trump stopped tweeting today, his approval rating would go up 10 points.
when any mass shooting happens is it the president’s fault?
i’m talking over the last few decades..
Whelp, here's the thing: I do think the media is biased against Trump, so I don't care what they think. These are the people who think Biden's comment about Obama being "clean" is a gaffe and not racially charged language.
But I still think Trumps tweets -- the Tweets I read with my own two eyes on twitter -- about the 4 women clearly express a strong nationalistic sentiment (I think it would be difficult to refute that) and are at the very least racially charged.
Do I think that I am 100% correct on this and that I know everything? No.
Is this how I see it? Yes.
when any mass shooting happens is it the president’s fault?
i’m talking over the last few decades..
@LoveUni -- yeah, I understand that. There is a HUGE media bias against Trump -- Trump gets called out for racist or let's say "racially charged" language -- while Biden commits harmless racial "gaffes" <== this is certainly a double standard.
That being said, just because the media protects Biden and throws the Trump under the bus doesn't mean Trump's language wasn't racially charged or whatever you want to call it.
As far as unbiased media: I follow Trumps twitter feed. That is my main source of information about Trump. Tells me everything I have to know.
when any mass shooting happens is it the president’s fault?
i’m talking over the last few decades..
The question isn't how do we disabuse liberals/democrats/whatever of the idea that Trump is racist. . . .
How do we convince white nationalists he isn't?
Any ideas? How would I go about convincing any of these folks he's not really racist?
when any mass shooting happens is it the president’s fault?
i’m talking over the last few decades..
The democrats are bad, the republicans are good. I'm learning a great deal from this thread - 1G2G
Yeah, no culty black and white thinking to see here lol. Very constructive conversation.
when any mass shooting happens is it the president’s fault?
i’m talking over the last few decades..
Golfing - the man works 24/7 with no sleep (trying to correct all the status vacays of the slugs in office the previous decades!)
I beg to differ. I live about 15 min from his Bedminster estate and drive by on my way to work.
He's here an awful lot.
Edit to add: Actually, he's been here all weekend.
seriously, it’s getting to a point that you can’t make a negative comment about someone without being charged as a racist, homophobe or sexist!
if you criticize a female, you are obviously sexist.
if you criticize someone who happens to be gay, you must hate homosexuals.
On the subject of “the squad”: Honestly, the president Tweeting "why don't they go back" and fix their shithole countries is about as stupid and inarticulate as a bunch of celebrities claiming that they're so upset with the outcome of the election that they’re going to ‘leave the country’ and go live in Europe or Canada for 4 years.
Whether it's the celebs or the prez (and remember the prez is both!) it's all a bunch of petty self-aggrandizing nonsense. Do any of these words from any of these people accomplish anything? NOPE!
seriously, it’s getting to a point that you can’t make a negative comment about someone without being charged as a racist, homophobe or sexist!
if you criticize a female, you are obviously sexist.
if you criticize someone who happens to be gay, you must hate homosexuals.
The question actually is: Can you compliment a person of color and still be racist?
seriously, it’s getting to a point that you can’t make a negative comment about someone without being charged as a racist, homophobe or sexist!
if you criticize a female, you are obviously sexist.
if you criticize someone who happens to be gay, you must hate homosexuals.
In my line of work, I regularly criticize black, white, hispanic, gay, straight, muslim, christian, jewish and many other combinations of ethnicity/gender/religion/etc..
I have never once been called "racist" -- even by those I've criticized -- and no one has ever accused me of using racist speech.
So I don't think the problem is criticism here. . .
what's up with the watchtower society still letting those they know to have sexually abused children go out in the field service despite that being crucial to the ruling against them in the conti suit?
they don't let men with beards go out in the field service in america with the justification that "beards are not the custom" and that therefore they "are not considered acceptable for christian ministers," but having sexually abused a child is somehow acceptable for a christian minister?.
last i checked molesting children isn't considered socially acceptable according to the customs of the united states and certainly finding out that child molesters are allowed to be jehovah's witness publishers is a whole lot more alienating to potential converts than them seeing jehovah's witness publishers with beards.
Being a child molester will not get you banned from the ministry. But you know what will?
TIGHT PANTS